Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Santiago of the Seas (2)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  redirect to Santiago of the Seas. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Santiago of the Seas (2)

 * – (View MfD)

Duplicate of a draft already located at Draft:Santiago of the Seas- the (2) draft is mostly a copy of the main draft, especially with the episode table. The Draft:Santiago of the Seas draft has been around since July, while the (2) is only in existence because an editor tried to go around the draft and instead headed to mainspace, with the article later moved to draftspace. There's no real need for both of these drafts, only the one actually being worked on should do. Magitroopa (talk) 04:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect. WP:SRE. WP:ATD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This probably should be history-merged back into the original draft. I can't do history merges on my mobile but I'll take a look later today if nobody beats me to it. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Never mind, this should just be deleted, maybe speedy per WP:G12. The earliest revisions were not copied from the first draft, but they were copied from a copyrighted source so they've been hidden. There's one revision where user copied content from the original draft to this page, but every other revision before that edit is copyvio and needs to be removed anyway if it hasn't already. I don't see the point of doing a history merge to split one revision and merge it back to another page when the original page doesn't change as a result, so the easiest fix is to delete the page entirely. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect The version without the (2) has enough going on its own, and changes to the (2) version have been merged into that one per .  The copyvios in both sections have been revdel'ed, and if not, they should be  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.