Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sarah Duque Lovisoni

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sarah Duque Lovisoni


This was deleted by unanimous consensus at Articles for deletion/Sarah Duque Lovisoni on 3 Jan 2016; the 5 submitted versions since then are not an improvement. Enough is enough. this is a attempt at publicity, not an encyclopedia article.  DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as no improvement being made and wasting time of reviewers, but why hasn't a speedy tag been applied due to a deletion discussion? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * G4 explicitly "excludes ... content that has been moved to user space or converted to a draft for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy)." and personally I've never seen it applied to drafts that way. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * 'Delete per nom. PR efffort with no value to the goals of the project. Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no evidence that this draft has provided anything in the way of references that overcome the reason for the original article deletion.  --Whpq (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.