Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Scooby-Doo! and Krypto, Too!

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  redirect to Scooby-Doo! and Krypto, Too!. (non-admin closure) C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 01:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Scooby-Doo! and Krypto, Too!

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Page already exists at Scooby-Doo! and Krypto, Too! Notrealname1234 (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect to Scooby-Doo! and Krypto, Too!. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: That's not a problem. Nominating it here is pointless bureaucracy, . Put your valuable time to work elsewhere– G13 will catch this in time. There is no valid reason for deletion. Edward-Woodrow  •  talk  19:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Edward-Woodrow it is a duplicate, i dont see this draft going anywhere soon. Notrealname1234 (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:Notrealname1234 - First, drafts that are not going anywhere are left alone and will expire in six months. Second, drafts that duplicate articles can be redirected to the article, and can be redirected unilaterally.  Third, don't waste your time and ours looking for duplicate drafts, but you can redirect them to the articles.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Fine. Notrealname1234 (talk) 19:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.