Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:SenecaGlobal Inc

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:SenecaGlobal Inc


Year-old draftspace draft for what looks like a non-notable company. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Query: this seems like a valid G13 -- is there some reason that procedure was not used?  DGG ( talk ) 02:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you not remember that non-AFC drafts are not subject to G13 and sit around in draftspace for all eternity unless someone reviews them? The CSD talk page rejected the expansion, rejected a prod proposal, rejected expanding the current prod system and so we are left to MFD as the review/deletion mechanism. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2016
 * actually, I may have missed something, because I thought the only thing decided was that drafts in userspace were not subject to G13.  DGG ( talk ) 19:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * No, AFC drafts, regardless of space, are subject to G13. There's a push to move all drafts to draftspace so that it's easier to see when the same topic is requested for restoration or a new copy is created. You don't recall starting Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I definitely remember my own proposal, which was "his applies to rejected or unsubmitted drafts that have not been edited in over six months (excluding bot edits). This criterion applies to all pages in the Draft or Draft talk namespace, all project space and project talk space, all drafts in the Wikipedia Talk:Articles for creation/ naming system, as well as all userspace drafts." there was however no consensus to adopt that. There was no consensus on the present text either, or on any other proposal.  DGG ( talk ) 02:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

"


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.