Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Shin Japan Heroes Universe

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  procedural close  this page has been moved to mainspace, leaving us without a draft to review. The nominator may take the article to AfD if necessary. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Shin Japan Heroes Universe

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Heavily reliant on WP:SYN. SHIN JAPAN HEROES UNIVERSE (SJHU) was not announced until February 2022 as a collaborative project, but most of the projects and films listed here were launched years before SJHU was a thing. The sources reveal that these projects had nothing to do with SJHU at the time of their releases. So Fico Puricelli is connecting dots to imply a conclusion.

Additionally, Fico Puricelli is jumping the gun here. The announcement did not reveal whether this is a now-canon cinematic universe or an ongoing film series. These sources (1, 2) confirm that details are "scant" and that more will be revealed later in the year. The only thing that's been confirmed is that the project will feature merchandise, special events and tie-ins (3).

This article should be deleted, or at the least, held off until more details emerge as to what this collaborative project really is. Keep in mind, Toho (the owners of Godzilla) and Khara (the owners of Evangelion) launched collaborative cross-over projects in the past such as GODZILLA X EVANGELION (4), a line of merchandise, and GODZILLA VS. EVANGELION (5), a 4-D ride at Universal Studios Japan. For all we know so far, this could be something similar rather than suddenly making these unrelated films (owned by separate studios) cinematically canon. Again, which the announcement did not confirm. Armegon (talk) 10:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a draft, and the nominator has given a good reason why the draft should be declined if submitted in the current form. Maybe the nominator isn't familiar with how draft space differs from article space.  The nominator writes:  This article should be deleted, or at the least, held off until more details emerge as to what this collaborative project really is.  Yes.  The way to hold off on a draft, which is not indexed and not normally seen by readers, is to defer submitting it.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I understand now. I'm not familiar on how procedures with drafts are done. I had no idea whether they warrant deletion or not. But yes. It's best to hold off passing/approving this article until more is revealed about the nature of this collaboration. I feel Fico Puricelli only saw the word "universe" and jumped the gun thinking this is the Hideaki Anno equivalent of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Armegon (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:Armegon - If you are not an Articles for Creation reviewer, and have comments about a draft, I would advise entering them on the draft talk page. In this case, the draft has not yet been submitted for approval, and so it will be held off.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, mainspaced. I accepted the draft, it is obviously notable. The WP:SYNTH is an editing challenge and not a reason to delete.  Disagree that it is reliant on the SYNTH.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.