Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Shyaway

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Shyaway


Page has been resubmitted four times for review with no real improvement to the referencing. It's just an advertisement for the company. I took a look for references and could not find anything that would come close to showing notability. /wiae /tlk  12:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It's also been speedied twice: once here (after three more submissions and declines), and once (by me) in mainspace. The current version is better than those were, but not by a whole lot.  Even if the subject has any potential—I haven't searched myself—nothing in the current contents or history would be helpful in making a proper article.  Delete. —Cryptic 20:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't know what to do with people who simply do not learn. But I do know that they waste a lot of people's time, and that's not ok. This article has 1) almost no content 2) zero references and 3) after 11 edits consists of 8 sentences. LaMona (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.