Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Simha Prasad

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy deleted by Dlohcierekim. RL0919 (talk) 22:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Simha Prasad


Three copies of the autobiography of an author who is now blocked for sockpuppetry. The language is highly self-serving, but what do you expect?

If the author is notable, a neutral editor can create a BLP, but reworking this autobiography will be like putting lipstick on a pig. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete self serving Legacypac (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if there is a valid notability claim here, he still (a) doesn't get to write the article himself, and (b) doesn't need three separate articles about it. Bearcat (talk) 06:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Bearcat - Creating multiple copies of drafts is common, and annoying to the reviewers. It can be done out of cluelessness, or in order to game the system.  In this case it is clearly an effort to game the system by changing his username so that it doesn't look like an autobiography.  I nominated because it is an autobiography by a blocked user, not because of the multiple copies, but since there are multiple copies, they needed to be bundled.  Robert McClenon (talk) 11:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * per user request G7 per request. At least the one I saw. WIll look more.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 22:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.