Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sonatafy Technology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. ✗ plicit  14:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Sonatafy Technology

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Likely UPE created by now-blocked sockpuppet account. See also Articles for deletion/Sonatafy Technology and Sockpuppet_investigations/Crount. Uhai (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Declined G5s and declined G11s can be tagged with AFC comments and left alone rather than sent to MFD. If new sockpuppets work on the draft, they can be reported at SPI.  If there are no new sockpuppets, the draft will go away in six months.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:SPAM. I don't see why we need to be soft on blatant spam. WP:JUNK should be deleted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. This item of junk is already composting in our backyard. We don't need to take it out of the compost, carefully examine it, invite a few guests over to dinner to discuss how much of a half-composted junk it is, and throw it in the garbage bin.—Alalch E. 12:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a non-argument for a keep !vote. Uhai (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * In short, he's saying that it's a waste of time and effort to nominate these items that no one will ever see for MfD. And I agree with him. It's unlikely anyone would ever have noticed these pages. ⛵ WaltClipper - (talk)  13:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep unless deletion is requested by an SPI clerk or checkuser. Other editors should not be using MfD to clerk for WP:SPI. If you’re interested in such things, get accredited at an SPI clerk. The author being blocked, including for sockpuppety, is not a reason for deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @SmokeyJoe I brought it here as a UPE target/creation, not because the creator is blocked or a sockpuppet. The mention of the block and SPI was to evidence and reinforce the claim of UPE. Uhai (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Deletion of UPE product makes it easier for them to succeed the next time. Better to tag the page, it’s talk page, and it’s authors’ userpages. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Zxcvbnm. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 06:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.