Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Stampylonghead

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 02:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Stampylonghead


Redundant to Joseph Garrett with no content worth merging. ~ RobTalk 23:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Don't delete notable topics, redirection in case of redundancy is better, various reasons, informative to the author, recognition that the topic actually is notable, if one person does it, so might another.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a single unsourced sentence with no related history. In the small chance that someone later wants to work on an actual proposed rewrite of the mainspace one or another one on that topic, they shouldn't have to go to Draft:Stampylonghead (2) just because someone slapped a one-sentence nonsense statement here first. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You miss the point. We now know, today, that no one should EVER draft on "Stampylonghead", whether (1) or (2).  It is already drafted, it is already in mainspace.  Anyone interested in Stampylonghead should be sent promptly to Joseph Garrett, do not return to DraftSpace.  DraftSpace is for new topics, not mainspace duplication.  DraftSpace should NOT be used for article "rewrites". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.