Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Steljes Audio

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. AGK &#9632;   21:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Steljes Audio


Minor subdivison of non notable UK agency. Previously deleted for overt promotion, now after thorough search of sources, even the parent agency cannot have sourced article much less its minor subdivision. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Could have been allowed to die a natural death of G13. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD and because it can be allowed the "natural death of G13." No need to discuss pages like this here. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * There's need, but nobody is forced. And then keep it exactly for what? for it to wait for process wonkishness and be deleted by g13 or to be improved? Draft space is not for indefinite hosting and what is evident that cannot become proper article can be nominated at any time without waiting for bureaucratic time span. In either case, it further shows why this junk should be deleted. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I do not consider waiting on G13 to be process "wonkishness" but rather something that functionally lightens the community's burden by avoiding full discussions like this. That aside, the draftspace is designed as a place for things waiting for improvement. There is really no need to ever delete most non-speediable drafts. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not the g13 that's the wonkishness per se, it's using g13 as a defense to host junk material. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion criteria exist so discussion is not necessary, making nominations such as these pointless work. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 17:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete not passable as an article so since we are here, no problem to delete. Legacypac (talk) 02:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.