Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Steve Sinnicks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Steve Sinnicks


Advertorially toned WP:BLP draft which has been rejected nine times for not making or reliably sourcing a strong claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC. Although the last rejection was in December 2015, there has also been the more recent development that a user recently tried to bypass AFC by copying and pasting the draft directly into articlespace at Steven Sinnicks without actually making any significant new improvements to it. Notability, per our inclusion and sourcing rules, simply is not there, so there's no point in continuing to hang onto it any further. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Deleteper nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is not a concern for drafts. If AFC doesn't want to review it, then remove the AFC notices entirely. We need more content creators. WikiCreativeJuicer (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * WikiCreativeJuicer has been blocked as a sockpuppet. -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, basically per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Sinnicks. When the article's topic simply isn't notable there's no need to keep a draft on the same topic. Huon (talk) 19:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.