Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Stewart Levenson

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No SALT yet unless we run into persistent recreation problems. I'll watchlist it and keep an eye. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Stewart Levenson


This is a waste of the community's time: it has been created by a declared paid editor to get around the outcome of an AfD and DRV that decided the original version was non-notable spam. The paid editor has continued to advocate on behalf of his client rather than letting neutral reviewers determine whether the subject meets the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia. Given the past AfD and DRV result, along with the behavior demonstrated on the talk page, deleting this draft as disruptive seems the best outcome. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delele and SALT Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Same as above per nom. -A la d insane  (Channel 2)  02:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability already assessed at WP:Articles for deletion/Stewart Levenson. you have 9 years of WP experience, with over 17,000 edits. In that amount of time you surely have picked up that it is not possible to make a non-notable subject notable, and your clean block log implies to me that you haven't habitually flogged a dead horse like this too many times. That leads me to think that the fact that you are getting paid is clouding your judgment. This is a job you shouldn't have accepted; it was unethical to take money to publish something here that you had a good idea would never last. Give a refund, drop the stick, and do something else before the choice to stop editing is made for you. VQuakr (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete-VQuakr seems to have put it very nicely. Winged Blades Godric 05:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The only thing new since the AfD is a declaration of candidacy. Fails WP:POLITICIAN unless and until this person is elected to the U.S. Congress. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and, and salt. The subject clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN and as it was ostensibly created as part of an electoral campaign, it also falls under WP:PROMO (a policy). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Despite the origin of this article & the draft, which makes deletion necessary, I think it might be possible to write a NPOV article that will show  notability , and I may try it eventually.  DGG ( talk ) 00:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above and per WP:ONEEVENT, without prejudice against the creation of a neutrally-written article by a neutral editor in the future if Levenson gains notability. Time to put the draft out of its misery. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete (and I'd go for Tom Paradise ‎ on much the same basis). Andy Dingley (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.