Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Suiteness

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Suiteness


6 reviews within a year and still nothing genuinely substantial and convincing for acceotance hence another review wouldn't help. My final comments here were clear quite clear why this was unacceptable but the Draft itself has stayed the same hence unimprovable. Our non-negotiable policies WP:NOT explicitly state we are both not a business listing and not a company webhist, and the fact this has nothing else actually convincing, that's far enough. SwisterTwister  talk  17:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Is this a DEL14 nomination? Lack of notability isn't a valid reason for deleting drafts, yet that appears to be the primary concern expressed in your comments on the draft. Rebb  ing  14:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The article in question is a draft and is still being worked on. The draft has been considerably improved per comments and suggestions left by reviewers (there are no more instances of promotional language as noted initially). Quick note on notability - the company has been extensively written about in top press like NY Times, LA Times, Tech Crunch and Wall Street Journal. Since the last review rejection, the company has grown, received new funding, and been covered in-depth by leading publications. Even if that is not already notable by Wikipedia standards, the company is surely on track to be notable as a travel website. I would request admin to re-consider the decision to delete the draft to allow users to continue to improve it. Dmulan123 (talk) 20:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Dmulan123
 * Keep. Lack of notability—the only argument made—is not an acceptable reason for deleting a draft. See WT:N/Archive 58 § RfC: Does WP:N apply to drafts in userspace or draftspace?; WP:Drafts (help) ("Drafts may be nominated for deletion at [MfD] but not on a primary concern of notability." (internal citation omitted)). Rebb  ing  20:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.