Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sukchain Singh

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  03:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Sukchain Singh

 * * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)



Two identical copies of an unsourced autobiography that is a biography of a living person. Biographies of living persons in article space, user space, and draft space must be sourced.

If the originator can add sourcing within seven days, that will warrant a Heymann keep of the draft, and the redirection of the sandbox to the draft; but the autobiography will still be non-notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:42, 18 November 2022 (UTC)|pg=Draft:Sukchain Singh}} Relisting comment: Discussion was not transcluded to Miscellany for deletion until now. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nom, as an unsourced BLP, if no reliable source is added within seven days (BLPPROD style). Although notability is not examined at MfD, I note in passing that it is an autobiographical WP:BIO- and WP:SPORTS-failing promotional drive-by post.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 10:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP with no sources. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.