Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sukuma Calendar

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sukuma Calendar


Delete and salt. Non-notable and possibly a WP:hoax. The main namespace article was deleted (see Articles for deletion/Sukuma calendar), and I have WP:SALTed Sukuma calendar and Sukuma Calendar per the topic being non-notable yet articles being repeatedly created, and per this possibly being a hoax. North America1000 00:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * DeleteAm not persuaded it is a hoax, it is certainly not a "blatant hoax" as asserted at AfD. It may be a clever hoax.  I problem for decision making here is that the worst hoax material is deleted and hidden from me.  But, what matters is that Articles for deletion/Sukuma calendar shows a clear consensus to delete.  Delete per that consensus.  Mentions of a 2700 year old calendar system in 3000 year old sources is plausible, but extraordinary, and so good sources are needed.  The draft references reliable sources, broadly, too broadly to assess.  For this topic, inline sources to page numbers should be required.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.