Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sumier Mention

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sumier Mention


Stale draft about an unnotable person. It could be someone messing around with their friends, due to the 1997 DOB.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   09:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and consider speedy. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Either a budding actor, or a deliberate act of promotion. See http://www.imdb.com/name/nm7276401/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm.  Does seem to be independently verifiable as an actor on a TV show, but no independent coverage.  Calling it "promotion" is a bit heavy handed.  "notability doesn't apply to draftspace" was strongly affirmed by RfC.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * So you're going to vote keep on this? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. I am hesitant to call "promotion" on a 19 year old who has actually had a running acting job.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Anyone can easily recreate this single sentence, preferably with a source in the future. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Well that's true. And the current content is no more than the current imdb material.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.