Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Surack Enterprises

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. ✗ plicit  10:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Surack Enterprises

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This article should probably be deleted -- if you look at the name of the user "bertehrmann", you can find that he is a contributor for one of the websites listed in the article (https://www.sweetcars.com/blog/author/bertehrmann). Not to mention the external link spamming, all of the companies listed on the article are already listed under the article for Chuck Surack. In my opinion it's clear this guy was just trying to promote the various websites/companies that Chuck owns by trying to make an article, but it was automatically a draft cause he had no previous contributions. ~XyNq tc 04:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not reasons to delete a draft. With no independent references, needed declining, and was declined.  Some nominators are too eager to delete drafts.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Some nominators are too eager to delete drafts No, I think you just have too much good faith in things that are clearly just junk. Do you really think someone who has a clear COI is going to be willing to delete his external link spam on a draft? No. It's just gonna sit there and rot for 6 months until it's manually cleaned up then.  ~XyNq tc 06:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * User:XyNq - So what? You referenced an essay that supports the deletion of articles that are junk.  This is not an article.  Junk in draft space is allowed to sit for 6 months in case someone comes along and adds content to it.  Drafts are not deleted simply because they are junk.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Even if it can't be deleted for simply being junk, anything that could potentially be put into this draft would be much better served just being put into the article for Chuck Surack. Surack Enterprises does not have any notability on its own, as it seems to just be a holding company containing various insignificant companies, other than Sweetwater Sound. WP:PAGEDECIDE - Sweetwater Sound and Chuck Surack deserve to be separate articles, but Chuck's personal holding company can easily be incorporated into the article he has, as it basically already is.   ~XyNq tc 18:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - On principle I will vote keep on MFDs for drafts. If deletion was necessary, it would be done through G13. --WaltCip- (talk)  14:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per WP:NDRAFT. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.