Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Swalah Said Mohamed

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  22:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Swalah Said Mohamed

 * – (View MfD)

Advertisement for non notable businessman, submitted five times without substantial improvement.  DGG ( talk ) 10:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Also has all the small of an UPE. When you combine that with the editor's lack of interest in actually improving the article, there's zero hope for the article and its constant re-submission is unwanted in an already backlogged AfC. Sulfurboy (talk) 10:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

guys, i understand due to my ability there might be some errors on my article, but i am from Tanzania the country which we cant speak english well, so i might provided right information with wrong language. but also i dont have  many days in here am new auth that too can be a reason, thats my artical please dont delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moses rukanima (talk • contribs) 11:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC) thats my first artical to create**** — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moses rukanima (talk • contribs) 11:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as WP:RESUME, especially the highlights. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 10:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is a resume, and is incompatible with an article based on independent sources.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The repeated resubmissions are tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Moses rukanima - We could improve the quality of the English, but the subject would still be non-notable, and you already submitted it five times without significant improvement. We can't help you.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment* - The article is improved now, I hope you guys might find some reason not to delete it. I have tried my level best to conduct some more researches about the topic and I have found a lot of information (Notable). its my first article you know so I can't just give it up. Regards Robert McClenon (talk), Sulfurboy, SmokeyJoe (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.