Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:System Requirements for MS-DOS Based Windows Versions

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts she/theytalk/stalk (please ping on reply) 05:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:System Requirements for MS-DOS Based Windows Versions

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Against the purpose of Wikipedia. Article consisting purely of Windows System Requirements and adds no encyclopedic value. No reliable sources cited. LLMs are not a reliable source. Deletion looks uncontroversial to me. Edit 1: Also add potential original research and weasel words to the issues. The fact that the draft might be going against WP:NOR just makes it more worthy of deleting. Mseingth2133444 ( talk / contribs ) 15:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Catfurball (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bduke (talk) 05:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 09:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: how long will we have to wait until this discussion is closed? Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 23:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's a draft. See NDRAFT. Drafts are not checked for notability.  Deletion is controversial because keeping the draft should be uncontroversial.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, @Robert McClenon, but I think you misunderstood. I am not nominating for notability, I am nominating for LLM misuse and because it goes against what Wikipedia is not. It is also unencyclopedic, going against the purpose of Wikipedia. Last time I checked, drafts are checked for the latter two criteria. Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 03:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Mseingth2133444 - Seven days. What's the rush?  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep average draft.—Alalch E. 11:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep; doesn't rise to the level of needing MfD deletion (see WP:NDRAFT). There is no reason this can't wait for WP:G13. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * See What Wikipedia is not, this clearly goes against that Mseingth2133444  ( talk / contribs ) 01:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * When it comes to hopeless drafts and deletion, I like to see draftspace as a compost. This page is a discarded rotten tomato (next to a discarded potato peel, outer cabbage leaves, and a zucchini that someone stepped on) that you took out of the compost, disturbing the composting process, to show people how much of a half-composted item it is, for them to examine its flaws ("sure looks like a rotten tomato!"), for you to throw it in the garbage bin, and for the garbagemen to take it away, when it could have dissolved on its own. —Alalch E. 02:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.