Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tandem Michael-aldol reaction

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I have deleted, although I have not blocked the editor at this time. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tandem Michael-aldol reaction


Already accepted as Multiple Michael/aldol reaction. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundent. Legacypac (talk) 23:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like confusion by, or sandboxing that should be deleted per WP:UP. Did you try asking her?  She appears active.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * User:SmokeyJoe - User:Carolineneil edits, to submit sandbox drafts via AFC, but has never responded to inquiries. There is an ongoing discussion at WP:ANI.  There have been multiple attempts to communicate that have failed.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Been done: Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents --Calton | Talk 01:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you both. (Although I sometimes comment at ANI, I do not routinely read it).  Two comments immediately jumped out at me as correct: I would recommend against blocking to get her attention. El_C 19:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC) I left a note and linked them to WP:Communication is required. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 15:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC) I recommend Delete and Block with a reference to WP:Communication is required.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.