Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tanner Fox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Tanner Fox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Non-notable person, which has deleted 4 times before. Frontman830 (talk) 07:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. (Where did I read that line the first time? Should it be an essay? It should absolutely be an essay. Any regulars object to me writing it?) As draftspace articles are automatically deleted under G13 after six months, an otherwise unproblematic draft for a non-notable subject should not be MfDed. That said, the number of prior deletions indicate there might be a time to MfD this, if it's being tendentiously resubmitted or if editors are trying to evade G13 -- but there's no indication of that yet. Vaticidalprophet 10:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, ironically, by nominating this you've delayed its deletion. It hadn't been edited since January, so it would have been deleted in a couple months, but now it'll make it quite late in the year. Vaticidalprophet 10:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Just only a draft article of a non-notable YouTube personality, but sometimes rejected (without reliable sources), and it was repeatedly recreated 4 times. --Frontman830 (talk) 13:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Struck !vote by nominator. Vaticidalprophet 22:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Partially reverted strikethrough to just the bolded duplicate Delete !vote, the nom can make further comments if they wish. SK2242 (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep:
 * It's a Rejected Draft. It needed rejecting.
 * It has been deleted from article space four times, twice after discussion, and twice speedily. That isn't a reason to delete from draft space.
 * Leaving it in draft space as Rejected will be useful, and will slow down further resubmission.
 * It doesn't need deleting from draft space.
 * Rejected drafts only can be deleted for nomination (even longer than several months). --Frontman830 (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NMFD. —  csc -1 14:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. Notability is not considered in regard to drafts as it would be for a page in the mainspace. No need to bring such things here. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 20:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.