Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:TauRho

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Draft:TauRho


This draft, with no independent references, about a non-notable company, was composed by a now-indeffed sockpuppet. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * No opposition to deleting now that we are here, but notability applied draftspace has been strongly rejected by the community, and is busywork at best. If the page doesn't reach the level of WP:CSD for promotion, just blank it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I will revise my argument. The issue is not primarily notability, because we do not delete due to notability in draft space.  It is because the author has been indeffed, and no one is working on the draft, so that in six months it will get a WP:G13.  Delete now and avoid the rush later.  Robert McClenon (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete' per Robert - User's indeffed, Article wouldn't survive a day in articlespace either. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:21, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.