Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Telecoming

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Telecoming



 * Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Anthony Appleyard - What is the problem with this as a draft? Why has it been nominated for deletion?  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - Is the editor planning to improve this draft, in which case I will favor Keep, or to resubmit it in its current state? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The editor is likely planning to improve this draft. It was originally speedy-delete-tagged at 12:21, 25 January 2017‎ by Rozybienert. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep in draft space. No reason to delete from draft space, where the standards are less stringent than in article space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment In reference to Robert McClenon's concern, the article has definitely been gutted of a lot of promotional material (see this diff) since it was originally submitted. It's a lot more neutral now. I should also mention that I speedied this page a few days ago without noticing the MfD, because the template had been removed and replaced with db-spam by the original author. A2soup gave me a heads up and I have since restored it to allow the MfD to continue. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - undisclosed paid editing. Google "Bienert Telecoming" and check the linkedin profile (2nd result when I searched). Cabayi (talk) 09:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment – I just notice Rozybienert reposted the article in the same condition using different title Telecoming.com so is it possible to protect the title? GSS (talk |c|em ) 10:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.