Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Baltic states medical cases chart

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Salvio 12:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Baltic states medical cases chart

 * – (View MfD)

The draft was created by one of the IPs that belongs to the range 186.111.128.0/20, which is now blocked for three months (disruptive editing). Two of these IPs was investigated for being socks of Bedriczwaleta, so this was likely made in evasion of a block.  SMB9 9thx   my edits  10:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Insufficient reason to delete.  Get an SPI clerk to attest to this deletion request.  "Likely" is weak.  Either it was block evasion, or not.  If block evasion, that is for SPI to decide and G5 will apply.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks. I got one already.  SMB9 9thx   my edits  07:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I mean, get an authorized SPI clerk to attest here that this page should be deleted, as a conclusion of the SPI case. Note that deletion of pages is a more serious outcome than blocking of the sockpuppets, and if G5 doesn't apply, the pages are rarely deleted without another reason.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! SPI clerk here. Per my comments at Sockpuppet_investigations/Bedriczwaleta, the best I can give you is "maybe" - I think this range is Bedriczwaleta but am not certain. The IPs on this range come from the same country as a past IP sock, speak Polish like the master, and are interested in the COVID case templates, but I don't have any evidence I would consider conclusive. If the range had not been blocked already, I might have blocked individual IPs as suspected socks. Sorry, I wish I could give a more solid answer here. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I tend to think a draft is the place for writers to put their unfinished articles. Lightburst (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't really like G5 in any case, I think it should matter more what an article contains than who wrote it. An unproven G5 is certainly not a good reason for deletion, particularly not in draft space. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - May be a working template some time. Not the sort of thing that G5 is for.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.