Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The 1+1 Calculation

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:The 1+1 Calculation

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Fails WP:NOTTEXTBOOK Zinnober9 (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 23:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom  Oxi  (Contact me) 11:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 13:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I don’t think WP:NOTTEXTBOOK applies to draft spaces. Also the template on the draft is broken. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I think that everything at WP:NOT can be a deletion reason for a draft. Note that WP:NOT does not include mention of WP:Notability.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Delete because it is not a reasonable draft for mainspace content. —-SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:02, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Will never be an articl ebecause of What Wikipedia is not, which does apply to draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.