Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The 75th Anniversary of the Great Victory

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [verbalize] || 18:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The 75th Anniversary of the Great Victory

 * – (View MfD)

Constant subject of multiple draft titles with no improvement in every case. Written like an essay, with no chance of being moved to article space. Duplicate information to Victory Day (9 May). Jalen Folf  (talk)  22:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Nominator note: has contributed greatly to merging all duplicate drafts to this one, which I had moved to this title following another series of duplicate attempts by another user. This recent attempt was the only series of attempts at duplicate drafts I noticed.  Jalen Folf   (talk)  22:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment There are a number of drafts on this same topic being submitted. Just do a search on 75th anniversary, and new ones keep popping up. This implies someone is either using this for a class or spamming abusively. I tried to redirect them all to a single topic, but another wave of drafts has appeared. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Post a note on the talk pages, and the user_talk pages of all the authors, informing them of School and university projects. That would be helpful. Beyond that, there is no problem here that looks to need solving. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * This sort of problem happens from time to time. It is predictable and recurring. Reviewers should be aware of this.  Deletion hides the problem and denies the community the opportunity to learn. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * One of the authors explained what is happening at WP:Teahouse. —teb728 t c 08:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * At WP:Teahouse, it is regrettable that no one pointed to School and university projects. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the merged draft, restore first 2 versions to user space of, and userfy the other drafts. Remove all submit templates. —teb728 t c 09:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Userfy It's definitely for an educational assignment. I agree with 's recommendation for this particular draft.
 * I'm userfying most of the peripheral drafts for now. This main ones have been edited by multiple users so that will be a bigger pain to split out.
 * Draft:75th Anniversary of the Great Victory is a bigger mess right now as there are multiple editors making incremental changes to that article. Recommend TNT on that one with instructions on this draft and the other draft on creating their own version in their userspace. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 15:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Here's a template I'm going to use if more of these show up. Put in the USERNAME of the person who edited and your SIGNATURE

Assignment removed
I removed your class assignment to draft:The 75th Anniversary of the Great Victory. If you wish to start your own version of this, please do so in your own userspace as with this link: Special:Mypage/The 75th Anniversary of the Great Victory. ~
 * I also recommend Salting all the common draft locations from new user editing at least until the class is done. The instructions can be posted on the draft spot so that people can make their own in their userspace. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Userfy the main block, get rid of the rest. Kudos to for bringing it all back together. I think it is important celebration of The Great Patriotic War, a 75th. I think it is important to have an article detailing it. I don't mind helping to bring it together, although sourcing from Russian newspapers and archives is always difficult.   scope_creep Talk  17:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Resubmitted after rejection, and that is sufficient reason to delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.