Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Brand Agency

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy Deleted G11. (non-admin closure) Legacypac (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Brand Agency


Almost tagged this as G11, but as since 4 others had seen it before and hadn't sending it to MfD to decide if WP:NOTSPAM/G11 applies to this draft. I was the 5th decline since April, this article doesn't look notable, and it is largely spam. Keeping it in draft space serves no purpose at this time. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete you are far too timid. Usually we give spam a couple passes at AfC before tagging. Passes are over now. Legacypac (talk) 05:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I find these exhausting. Reference bombed with many sources, someone has tried hard, doesn't it deserve to have me at lead read every source before declaring it "spam", "inherent promotion", "not notable"?  My idea is at Wikipedia_talk:Notability.  For every new AfC submission, or new article found in NPP, where the impression is strongly of non-notable promotion, the author should be immediately challenged to name the 2-3 best sources for independent reliable coverage.  Usually, the "independent" part it the hardest work, due to the common advertorial promotion of new businesses.  The articles involve for-profit companies, their products, or their CEOs.  Preferably, I would like any new page on only commercial product or organisation or person to have a requirement to put forward their 2-3 best sources for independent reliable coverage.  1 is too few.  4 is too many.  If the 3 best can't meet the notability threshold, it can't be met.  Let the author nominate the three best.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.