Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The prospective of Omniscient Alpha & Omega Thermodynamic Sigma ZG Matrix Technology and Traditional Thermodynamic

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. CSD G3 which is valid in Draft space Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:The prospective of Omniscient Alpha & Omega Thermodynamic Sigma ZG Matrix Technology and Traditional Thermodynamic

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Seems to be a very poorly written advert for authors book. All ref's are advertising content or 'prnewswire'. Q T C 04:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as per Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. This draft has sanity problems.  It is too opaque to be G11.  Needs Rejecting if submitted, which is what we do to drafts with sanity problems. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. It’s a draft, by someone who should be using draftspace.  I have welcomed them, which provides them with links they should read.  I advise them to improve existing content before trying to write a whole new topic.  The promotion alleged does not rise even close to WP:G11-eligible, and there is no reason to rush AfC standard processes here.  -SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment This is just more of the Josammy/Mostini nonsense (hoax or promo, not sure) we keep seeing on a regular basis. I must have requested speedy on at least ten of these before, and will do the same with this one while you guys deliberate. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.