Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The roblox April Fools 2012 hack

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Can we please let stuff like this just die as G13, especially if it's close? &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:The roblox April Fools 2012 hack


I've found multiple sources to prove that this hack *happened*, but few to none of them are WP:RS. Therefore nonstarter. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Terrible rationale.  That's a comment you can put on the talk page.  You use the word "nonstarter" very very loosely.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I did find sources, but they were YouTube, Blogger, etc. No RS, therefore, we cannot make an article of it. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You being unable to find RSs is not a reason to delete from draftspace. If submitted, it is a reason to Reject the submission.  The page has not even been submitted.  There have been discussions in the past that clearly demonstrated that the community approves wide latitude for unproved topics in draftspace.  There is no reason for deletion, WP:SK#1 applies.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Should have been allowed to die a natural death next month. It isn't worth nominating stupid drafts for deletion just because they are stupid drafts unless they are being resubmitted.  (I don't think unregistered editors should create drafts, but that is my opinion.)  Unfortunately, now keeping this will last until October rather than May.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete a good faith effort to prove notability failed. No new sources are going to develop on a 6 year old hack. It's doomed. Legacypac (talk) 05:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Doomed, If as you say, doomed to the G13 process involving G13 style notifications and log pointer to WP:REFUND/G13. That may be its doom, but it should not be deleted via any other process. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.