Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tobacco Playbook

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. No consensus to delete. No prejudice against re-nomination or a rename. Userfication may also be preferable as this is less a draft than a collection of notes. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tobacco Playbook

 * Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Advocacy, based on assemblage of selected quotations inappropriate for an encycopedia even in draft space. (despite my total agreement with the implied viewpoint here)  DGG ( talk ) 05:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as per nom. I totally agree and the article probably covers an important subject but it is not encyclopedic. If a book had been written about this subject or a television program that had received serious coverage then this could be the subject of an article. As it is it is impossible to turn this into a neutral article.Domdeparis (talk) 11:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep. Google News and Google Books searched do seem to indicate that there is a coherent topic known as the "tobacco playbook", encompassing strategies used by marketers of unhealthy products to sow doubt as to the science demonstrating the hazards of the product. The massive table would need to be converted to more expository text, and the voice clarified. If that can be done in the next six months, the question can be revisited then. bd2412  T 00:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 14:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As written, this seems more like an essay than an article draft. The collection of sources does seem like it could be helpful in creating an article at Tobacco playbook eventually, though, and that seems a potentially valid topic. So I guess keep or userfy. VQuakr (talk) 06:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.