Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tokunbo Omishakin

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Tokunbo Omishakin

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Please withdraw nomination. I did not know that drafts were not deleted as duplicates and nommed this one after a speedy redirect was removed. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 12:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC) Draft is a duplicate of an article which already exists in mainspace: Toks_Omishakin. As the reviewer noted, the existing article should be improved rather than this duplicate draft. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 15:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks like something could happen to the article, however. —Alalch E. 21:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep—the article was deleted. The draft though has a set of references within it that should pass WP:GNG, thus the draft, if moved to mainspace with some improvements, should be kept. Thus, we should continue to refine the draft and publish it.  Imzadi 1979  →   23:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article was deleted, and the draft should be kept for improvement. This draft should never have been nominated for deletion anyway, because drafts are not deleted on account of the existence of an article with the same (or equivalent) title, but are speedily redirected to the article.  Please don't nominate drafts for deletion as duplicating an article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.