Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tom+Rodden

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. With only two edits to the nominated page, one being the MfD tag, I don't see a non-trivial history to maintain. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Tom+Rodden


There is also a draft at Draft:Tom Rodden. This is an unlikely form of his name and does not need to be a redirect. Just delete this. The individual is probably notable, but the properly named draft needs better references. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete if redirected the redirect would be rightly deleted at RfD. Legacypac (talk) 21:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect. Don’t delete due to the non trivial history. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.