Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tomuchcake

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Tomuchcake

 * – (View MfD)

Meets criteria for speedy deletion: G3, G11. Evidently not notable. Speedy deletion wiped by creator. Edit: In my opinion G3 is relevant because the content on the page is fantasy and false, intended to mislead. Quick web search will confirm this. It could be a joke article, but regardless has no place on Wikipedia.Torpedoi (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. No opinion on G3 (please supply evidence or argument for these claims), I think it should be covered by G11 despite others thinking G11 is very narrow.  Delete as unsourced promotion.  Even in the unlikely event of notability, articles need to be crafted from NPOV independent coverage, which this is not, and the answer would be WP:TNT.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax (although not an immediately obvious one - at first glance I thought this was just a typical not-very-good draft about a Youtuber and wondered why the OP would bother to bring it to MFD). Google shows that no Youtuber by this name exists (much less has 25 million subscribers). Spicy (talk) 13:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete based only on the statements by the other editors that it is a hoax. Otherwise could be ignored.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.