Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Top 100 Airlines in the World 2016

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Top 100 Airlines in the World 2016


Well over 6 months since improvements but G13 declined because of this edit "09:06, 14 January 2017‎ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)‎ . . (7,135 bytes) (-5,098)‎ . . (rv, too many NFCC violations to sort through individually)"  creator has abandoned the page. It recreates a ranking from a magazine which is in itself a form of copyvio. We should not be republishing 100 item subjective lists created by a professional writer and subject to copyright. Legacypac (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and Copyright in lists. MER-C 05:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If there's no objective criterion for this list, then it can be Nuked as a copyvio. --Calton | Talk 23:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.