Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Typing.com

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong&#8288;—  06:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Typing.com

 * – (View MfD)

This draft page was recently created and does not have any true facts about Typing.com. It tells about opinions about Typing.com, for example, the only thing that i, the writer of this document do not enjoy about this educational game is when you go on a part of the game called 'stories'. See "Wikipedia is not an essay" and "G11".  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * keep just let g13 take care of it. This MFD is a waste of both your time and the rest of ours, there's nothing immediate that warrants this deletion, it hasn't been tendentiously submitted. Just let it be. Praxidicae (talk) 20:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , please read WP:G13. Note that G13 only applies to draft spaces or userspaces with that have not been edited for at least 6 months.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 20:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Please save the lectures. This nom is ridiculous and an abuse of MFD. Praxidicae (talk) 20:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , this page is in the draftspace, so it will eventually be eligible for G13. If anything your MFD has pushed back that date by four months now. Primefac (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete because we are here. As noted above, should have been left alone, because an MFD nomination has the effect of restarting the calendar.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is an unsubmitted draft and shouldn’t come to MfD for such objections. It is verifiably real. “Opinions” are exactly what is wanted, except that the opinions need to be published.  Facts can come later from the non independent sources. I think it unlikely to ever be a stand alone page, but it could get a mention at Typing game. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree with DGG below that the current content is out of scope. It could be offered as a user review on an independent website, which does not include Wikipedia.  On looking harder, this is just another worthless very specific WP:CORP and it has no chance of becoming suitable.  I disagree that this means it should be processed by MfD.  The AfC process of DECLINE or REJECT suffices.  Are these not readily available on unsubmitted drafts?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete personal opinions about a web site are out of scope for Wikipedia .  DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete because its been nominated, keeping this now will serve as an endorsement of this crap to the author. SK2242 (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Praxidicae and SmokeyJoe. I would also like to rebuke the principle of deleting this draft because it has been nominated here and that doing otherwise will seem like an endorsement to the draft's author. That may be true to some extent, however, it is far more of a slippery slope to delete the draft and thereby endorse the nominator's action of bringing it here. It is not necessary and is a timesink to list such pages here and it is much more important to discourage that. On an aside, Primefac is correct about how G13 works in their comment above. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 17:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.