Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:US Dedicated

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy Delete. Deleted by under G5 (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 10:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:US Dedicated

 * – (View MfD)

Promotional article by a now blocked undisclosed paid editor. The coverage is routine and not significant. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:46, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - a sockpuppet moved this spam back into mainspace two hours after I quarantined it. Not a good sign, and one that justifies the bureaucracy of a deletion debate. MER-C 20:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Put back in mainspace and AfD it. Draftspace is optional.  WP:UPE is not a deletion reason (see current discussion at WT:DEL) in article space, and certainly not in draftspace. MER-C should not be move-warring, use AfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with User:SmokeyJoe that User:MER-C is, and should not be, move-warring, but Terms of Use violation certainly is a reason for deletion, and promoting anything to mainspace to delete it is a terrible idea. Now that this is here, delete it here.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Really?!? TOU is a reason for deletion?  Please point to anything at WP:DEL.  Have you read the discussion at WT:DEL?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems effectively the same draft that was deleted at Articles for deletion/US Dedicated (although it was a soft delete); the additional edits are trivial and do not involve refs so it would be a WP:G4 if moved to mainspace.  When a PAID sock can't prove WP:GNG, I am not sure anybody else will? Britishfinance (talk) 12:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: I don't believe move-warring applies to reversing the page move of a sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Deleted per G5. Drmies (talk) 01:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.