Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Universal topology in physics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Universal topology in physics


I think somebody meant to nominate this for MfD but didn't complete the process. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 08:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The writer, Vitumanity, added the first MFD tag, so perhaps you can treat this as a speedy delete request. However that was in response to a bad A10 nomination for speedy delete, so we can count this as not a genuine delete self-nom, but due to confustion. The A10 is inapplicable, as the article does expand on the topic of Spacetime topology, and if a draft is not appropriate either. Also this appears to have been an article recently and no created as a draft.  Can someone clarify those moves? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * there is more than one copy flouting around. No I can't clarify the moves all very confusing. Legacypac (talk) 01:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Physics adventurism like this is the reason for the policy WP:NOR. Delete as OR. Anything real belongs in mainspace, not forked to draftspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.