Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Uniworld Logistics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 15:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Uniworld Logistics

 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 05:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 05:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

In 3 reviews, the stated concerns in my first review which laid the concerns here haven't been fixed and what's only here is clear PR, therefore nothing to suggest acceptance in our policies, regardless of whether the company itself wants this article accepted; with this said, it's quite clear the sources themselves are simply advertising and simply stating it as otherwise or at least saying "But it's sourcing" is not what our policies themselves accept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 00:38, January 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant promotion with Reference bombardment.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.