Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:UrbanClap

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete and salted. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:UrbanClap


The article on UrbanClap has been deleted, re-created and deleted again several times. There is a long-term problem of affiliated/paid editors pushing for this article. The creator of this draft is yet another of these. The sources cited are churnalism - press releases not independent journalism. This appears to be an abuse of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. I get that UrbanClap is very keen to advertise on Wikipedia, they don't seem to understand that this feeling is not in any way mutual. Guy (Help!) 11:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt jesus, not again. To expand on my rationale since NOTAVOTE- the company is, despite the extensive past efforts of marketing companies, fundamentally non-notable per the judgement at Articles for deletion/UrbanClap (4th nomination) which I agree with. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt and block the creator per WP:NOTHERE. This company has already wasted far, far too much volunteer time. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.