Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Use of wormwood recreations

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Yche3321/OLES2129/Feature Article


The original MfD was deleted as G7 after being blanked by the creator, who recreated (substantially identical) drafts in 4 separate locations at around the same time. Since this is a different set of drafts and it was quite late in the MfD, I have renominated them. It is unclear if this is intended to avoid scrutiny, but having multiple copies of the draft can only mean more work. At most, there should be one draft, with the others deleted and redirected. The concerns about tendentious submissions may still apply, though there has been little activity from the user recently. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: I think the tendentious editing described in the original MfD has become disruptive editing. AfC is already burdened with a massive backlog, we can't allow people to submit four copies of the same draft in the hope of not putting all one's eggs in one basket.  A warning should suffice for now, if it happens again NOTHERE may have to be invoked.    SITH   (talk)   11:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Use of wormwood, in which previous versions of these articles were nominated, but were then blanked by the author, and the MFD was closed as G7. As noted, the submitter has now created them again.  It isn't clear whether they are trying to get them into article space or are just playing some sort of silly game.  It doesn't matter.  We are here at MFD so that the issue is whether to delete more crud, which is yes, but if this continues, a next stop might be WP:ANI or the vandalism noticeboard.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - OLES2129 is a class at the University of Sydney. OLE may be On-Line Editing.  This one student in the class is being disruptive.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.