Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Utility Associates Inc (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per criterion G11 by Jimfbleak. Steel1943 (talk) 22:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Utility Associates Inc

 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Utility Associates Inc
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Utility Associates Inc

This draft has already been deleted twice as advertising and re-created twice. I am requesting formal deletion just in case. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as promotion. Warn the author that he may be blocked for repeated creation, and that this topic would need to meet WP:CORP.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Overtaken by events. Author has been blocked and page has been given a third G11.  The problem was that the author's employer, as is too often the case, gave the author instructions to do what neither the company nor the author knew was completely against the way Wikipedia works.  Thanks to User:Jimfbleak.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.