Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:VIYCE

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:VIYCE


Although the author (currently blocked) insists that this is not a hoax, I am unable to find any RS evidence that the subject of this draft actually exists. If another admin sees this and concludes it's a hoax, I'm fine with a speedy. In any event, it certainly does not pass WP:N. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I found something labeled as a trailer for this on YouTube. (Don't go there. Just take my word for it.) There is not the slightest possibility that this is ever going to pass our notability guidelines. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete This subject has not received significant coverage from a reliable source. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 01:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, unlikely to ever become notable. It passes G3. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Susmuffin's reasoning. It also fails WP:N. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as persistently resubmitted and as having no credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.