Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Veronica Cabral Reynoso

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  13:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Veronica Cabral Reynoso


Stale draft, not edited in eight months except for my rejection notice and some routine dabfix maintenance, about a person not properly sourced as passing any Wikipedia notability criterion -- the references here are almost entirely to blogs, Twitter and a local public access channel, not to reliable or notability-assisting sources. Only one source (reduplicated as two separate footnotes for no apparent reason) counts as reliable source coverage at all, but one source isn't enough to pass WP:GNG by itself. Bearcat (talk) 04:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly abandoned, only not G13able due to the dabfixes from July. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete DAB fixes are minor edits and in my experience do not prevent G13 under the revised wording.
 * Delete as per nom. No indication from reliable sources they pass GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.