Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Vezlay Food

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Vezlay Food


submitted multiple times without i,provements. No RS evidence for the claims.  DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete–In its current state, this is just promotional fluff with no support for notability. Being submitted multiple times without improvement wastes the time of reviewers, a form of disruptive editing.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  02:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * User:DrStrauss and joe decker both in recent reviews appear to offer hope for the draft. It has a lot of ghits.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not that optimistic. I haven't seen credible sources that would go to CORPDEPTH. --joe deckertalk 18:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I had looked at a number of those ghits. Aside from the BW interview, all seemed to merely be offering for sale products made by this company or very routine business announcements. Had I found something better, I'd not have been in support of delete. But I can't read what sources not in English say, so there may still be a case made based on them.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  23:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion, way short of meeting WP:CORP. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.