Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WPA Intelligence

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:WPA Intelligence

 * CoolSkittle (talk) 05:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 17:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

These drafts are the only work by User:AnnieCR 1991. The persons are all associated with WPA Intelligence. The author has declared a connection with respect to Stephenson, using a malformed box, and has not declared the connection with the other articles, so that this is mostly Undisclosed Paid Editing, that is, paid editing, mostly undisclosed. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment the sourcing stinks but WPA itself could be notable. The people working for it, much less likely. Legacypac (talk) 23:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Does that mean to keep the company and delete the people? Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree that the company may be notable, but am arguing for deleting its draft as UPE without prejudice to re-creation by someone else. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The COI has disclosed. Is there any reason they couldn't keep working on the draft company article to provide sourcing? valereee (talk) 11:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 17:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle  (talk) 05:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. As is being discussed at WT:DEL, being UPE or COI product is not per se a reason for deletion.  AfC is meant for COI writing.  Get the author to make a declaration.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.