Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Wall Street Blockchain Alliance

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 03:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wall Street Blockchain Alliance

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 08:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 03:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft from November 2015 for what seems like a non-notable organization. The creator is still active here but this is draftspace and not userspace so that shouldn't be the only factor to me. Ricky81682 (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Seems a worthy draft.  Verified.  Notability is plausible, and notability is not a factor to consider at MfD for drafts.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * North America, what makes you think this discussion is worth a second relist? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Two participants is hardly enough to draw a consensus from, particularly when the opinions are divergent, and I don't perform WP:SUPERVOTES. For more information, see WP:RELIST. North America1000 07:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Two is more enough to close given that the nominator fails to articulate a reason for deletion, the non-committed mention of notability flying in the face of recent RfCs clearly demonstrating that WP:N is not a test to be applied to drafts. Your relisting, which is not required by WP:RELIST but is done on your judgement, appears to support the notion that the MfD has a worthy nomination for continued discussion, twice!  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Does not appear that way to me. Appears to me that Northamerica1000 was doing a very standard relisting, in a neutral and nonprejudicial manner.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 09:47, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Of course I'm biased, as I created this draft, as well as many others on the same cryptocurrency topics (see Category:Draft-Class Cryptocurrency articles)  This draft is verifiable, a work in progress, and doesn't meet any CSD criteria, I go with keep. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.