Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:What is the importance of trees and how to preserve them

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:What is the importance of trees and how to preserve them

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Content look like forum-ish or blog to me, therefore delete per what Wikipedia is not guideline  Xingqiu  •  Talk  11:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Withdraw Report is malformed as there are no wikilink to the target draft being nominated. Xingqiu •  Talk  11:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Comment Withdrawal of nomination has been canceled, now open for debate. Thanks User:PorkchopGMX backup for this. Xingqiu •  Talk  15:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete – this draft is harmless and should have been permitted to die a natural death, but since we're here we might as well delete per WP:NOTESSAY etc. For future reference, MfDing drafts is frowned upon in all but exceptional circumstances: see WP:NDRAFT and WP:RAGPICKING. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Unlikely to be able to be fixed before it expires.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a plausible draft. It is an essay unrelated to the purpose of Wikipedia.  WP:NOTADVOCACY. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.