Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Whitevale Cemetery

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Whitevale, Ontario. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:38, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Whitevale Cemetery


While this is a real place, there are no sources available to improve this article, and it has no chance of ever being ready for mainspace. A Google search doesn't turn up a single reliable source on this topic, and two of the sources given in the article have since gone offline. As this is tagged as a promising draft, it needs to go through MfD. Brad v  12:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Speedy Redirect I would have just mainspaced this but since it has been brought to MfD I have merged the page to Whitevale, Ontario and this should now be redirected there. If someone knows how to fix the image display issue at the target please fix it.Legacypac (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral-Strip - The Promising Draft tag definitely needs to be removed, and we can start the calendar running. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd be okay with that too, but recent discussions at WT:CSD are indicating that there is no consensus as to whether that template can be removed. Brad  v  15:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Whitevale,_Ontario. Everyone should consider redirection before deletion.  Drafting sub-topics should be done in the main article in mainspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I would have happily redirected it, but it had a promising-draft template on it. The jury's still out on whether we're allowed to remove those. Anyway, it's been done now so this can probably be closed. Brad  v  05:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The promising draft has produced unexpected controversy. My opinion is that it does not limit redirect of content forks.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.