Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Willi Schneckenberger

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 20:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Willi Schneckenberger


Draft from October 2014 for what seems to be a fictional WWII soldier. I'm not sure why that is. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As an article, it would be eligible for speedy deletion under WP:A1, no context. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * A1 doesn't apply to drafts. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know, that's why I said "As an article, it would be eligible...". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fictional, some of the text paraphrasing the information of a different WW2 soldier which Wikipedia does have an article on, under a similar name to this. I don't think this would qualify as an article as a CSD A1 because even though it's not notable, this article has plenty of context and it certainly does not meet CSD G1 because the writing is clearly fluent. However, this however wouldn't survive an A7, and wouldn't survive a PROD/AFD either. Hx7 15:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It says it's about a fictional soldier, but where's the fictional context? Book, film, what? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * When I mean the context, I mean any text that when it would be published as an article, that could be useful to the editor in trying to find sources to back up that - that's what I was trying to explain when I said that it wouldn't qualify as CSD A1. Hx7 18:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK, I see what you mean. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.