Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Wimalawansa Foundation

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 03:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Wimalawansa Foundation


Non-notable organization; article written by admitted COI account with no prior history. See WP:NOBLECAUSE. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  04:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The AFC project is also for the education of the contributors, and in this case it appears no feedback by the AFC process has happened yet. So I would suggest that there is no deletion yet, and the page is declined in the normal way. COI editors areencourage to use this process, so we should not bite back so soon.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete A large portion is a copyvio. This check shows precisely how much. While there is sufficient material present to rule out a CSD in my view, there is so much rewriting required that it needs to be started afresh. Normally I would agree with on this, but the copyvio element is sufficient for me to disagree with his more usual approach.  Fiddle   Faddle  23:29, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.